Egyptian striker claims match was rigged after World Cup defeat to just before quarter-finals
This story involves allegations of wrongdoing. Any claims of wrongdoing described here are allegations, not established facts, unless a court or official body has ruled otherwise. This disclosure does not remove our responsibility for what's published below.
See sources Request a correction Report a serious problem / request takedown Corrections & takedown policy
AI-assisted synthesis, reviewed and approved by the editorial team. Generated , updated since first publication on as new sources were added. Approved by editorial team: .
Egypt's Mostafa Ziko claimed the match against Argentina was "rigged" following a series of contested officiating decisions in Atlanta. The result allows the defending champions to advance to the upcoming quarter-final against Switzerland.
Amalgamated from The Mirror (opens in new tab), The Mirror (opens in new tab), The Mirror (opens in new tab), The Sun (opens in new tab), The Sun (opens in new tab), The Mirror (opens in new tab), The Mirror (opens in new tab)
Egypt lost 3-2 to Argentina in a round of 16 match held in Atlanta during the World Cup. The Egyptian team maintained a two-goal lead until the final 15 minutes, at which point Argentina staged a comeback to win the contest and advance to the next stage.
Match results and allegations
Following the conclusion of the game, Egyptian striker Mostafa Ziko claimed that the match was "rigged." He also criticized the performance of referee Francois Letexier, alleging that the official "kept coming at" his team throughout the contest. Reports from The Mirror indicate these comments were part of an outburst following the final whistle as Egypt's tournament run ended.
Refereeing and VAR controversy
A primary point of contention for observers was the role of video assistant referee (VAR) technology. A goal scored by Mostfa Ziko was disallowed after a review due to what some reports described as a soft foul in the build-up. This decision sparked significant pushback; The Sun reported that fans on social media platforms claimed Egypt were "robbed" of their win. Additionally, Gary Neville commented on what he characterized as a double standard regarding how VAR was applied during the match.
Tournament status and official response
The fallout from the Atlanta game has prompted internal responses from governing bodies, with reports from The Mirror indicating that FIFA is moving to issue new bans in response to the controversy. While these matters are addressed, the tournament continues for other nations. Argentina is scheduled to face Switzerland in the upcoming quarter-finals. Meanwhile, members of the Norwegian squad are reportedly dealing with a spread of illness ahead of their match against England.
Why this matters
The allegations regarding officiating and VAR consistency have sparked significant debate over the integrity of the tournament's refereeing standards. The issuance of new bans by FIFA suggests that the controversy in Atlanta may lead to disciplinary changes or personnel adjustments within the governing body's oversight of match officials.
What's confirmed / what isn't
The final score of 3-2 and Argentina's advancement to face Switzerland are confirmed by multiple reports. The claim that the match was "rigged" is an allegation made specifically by Mostafa Ziko, while the assessment of a "double standard" is attributed to Gary Neville. The report that FIFA is issuing new bans comes from The Mirror.
Background
Argentina is the defending World Cup champion as of 2024. VAR technology was introduced to provide real-time reviews of potential errors, including fouls and goals, during international football matches.